Re-Rates and De-Rates using Equivalent Hydrotest Stress
Why use Turnaround EPC, Inc. for your rerate or derate?
Speed in Proving Viability: We quickly determine if your pressure vessel or heat exchanger is a good candidate for a rerate*.
Calculation Accuracy: We are experienced in using the latest software tools to generate the ASME Code calculations required for rerates and derates.
Cost Savings: New pressure vessels and heat exchangers are expensive. Constructing a new vessel may not be necessary if another vessel can be rerated to meet your production needs.
Lead Time: Most new pressure vessels and heat exchangers take months to complete from design to installation. Rerated vessels may be used right away.
Process Experience: We are experienced in identifying API 571 damage mechanisms in process equipment and we understand the types of damage that may necessitate a derate.
Reasons for a pressure vessel or heat exchanger rerate:
Increased production: To increase output, it might be necessary to operate the vessel or heat exchanger at a higher pressure or temperature than the original Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAWP).
Process changes: Process evolution may require equipment to be reused in a new process, requiring a different Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAWP) for the pressure vessel or heat exchanger than the original design.
Corrosion consideration: Original design calculations may not have considered corrosion and process realities may require a rerate to adequately consider observed process corrosion.
Fitness-for-service assessment: An inspection might reveal that the vessel or heat exchanger has reduced integrity due to local damage, necessitating a reduction in the Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAWP).
*Metalmark Engineering PLLC does not consider rerates that require a hydrotest to be good candidates. Most rerates do not require a hydrotest.
Location Matters for De-Rates During Turnarounds
Let’s talk about de-rating equipment during turnarounds. Not every jurisdiction allows it.
De-rating in-service equipment greatly lowers operational risk of a facility because it ensures unsafe pressures and temperatures for degraded equipment are no longer available per nameplate. In essence, it prevents C-Suite executives from trying to force any of their unsafe ideas onto unsuspecting operators without immediate pushback. I perform these “Safety De-Rates” as a tool in my turnaround toolbox for mechanical integrity programs in Texas and pretty much everywhere else.
…but not in California. Circular Letter PV-2001-1 makes it clear that de-rates for process safety reasons, or any other reason, during turnarounds are not allowed. I do not and will not perform any de-rates or re-rates in California even though the plethora of decommissioned equipment sitting around makes it tempting.
Thinking about de-rating your equipment for process safety reasons? Turnaround EPC specializes in de-rating heat exchangers and pressure vessels.